DeepSeek V3 is 89% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out, while DeepSeek V3 costs $0.14/1M in and $0.28/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and DeepSeek.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) | DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.80 | $0.14 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $4.00 | $0.28 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.080/1M | $0.014/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $1.600 / 1M | $0.175 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 131k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 75.2% | 88.5% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) | Fast (~60 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning | General LLM routing, high-scale automation, cost reduction vs OpenAI |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your workload requires real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose DeepSeek V3
Choose DeepSeek V3 if your primary objective is general llm routing, high-scale automation, cost reduction vs openai. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with DeepSeek.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Haiku against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.