GPT-4o (Omni) is 27% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.50/1M in and $10.00/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out.
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | GPT-4o (Omni) (OpenAI) | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $2.50 | $3.00 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $10.00 | $15.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $1.250/1M | $0.300/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $4.375 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 200k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.7% | 88.3% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~45 t/s) | Fast (~50 t/s) |
| Best For | Complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning |
When to Choose GPT-4o (Omni)
Choose GPT-4o (Omni) if your workload requires complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your primary objective is autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.