GPT-4o Mini is 84% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out, while GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M in and $0.60/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4o Mini
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) | GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.80 | $0.15 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $4.00 | $0.60 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.080/1M | $0.075/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $1.600 / 1M | $0.263 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 75.2% | 82.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~85 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning | High-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your workload requires real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose GPT-4o Mini
Choose GPT-4o Mini if your primary objective is high-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Haiku against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.