Home  /  Comparisons  /  Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4o (Omni)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 63% cheaper than GPT-4o (Omni) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out, while GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.50/1M in and $10.00/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4o (Omni)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.

Metric / Feature Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) GPT-4o (Omni) (OpenAI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.80 $2.50
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $4.00 $10.00
Prompt Caching Input Rate $0.080/1M $1.250/1M
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $1.600 / 1M $4.375 / 1M
Max Context Window 128k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ✅ Supported
MMLU Benchmark 75.2% 88.7%
Throughput & Latency Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) Fast (~45 t/s)
Best For Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning Complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis

When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your workload requires real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Claude 3.5 Haiku Specs →

When to Choose GPT-4o (Omni)

Choose GPT-4o (Omni) if your primary objective is complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.

View Full GPT-4o (Omni) Specs →

Want to compare Claude 3.5 Haiku against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.