Home  /  Comparisons  /  Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) is 96% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out, while Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) costs $0.05/1M in and $0.08/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and Groq (Meta).

Metric / Feature Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) (Groq (Meta))
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.80 $0.05
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $4.00 $0.08
Prompt Caching Input Rate $0.080/1M Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $1.600 / 1M $0.058 / 1M
Max Context Window 128k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark 75.2% 73.0%
Throughput & Latency Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) Blazing (~550 t/s)
Best For Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning Instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification

When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your workload requires real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Claude 3.5 Haiku Specs →

When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) if your primary objective is instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).

View Full Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) Specs →

Want to compare Claude 3.5 Haiku against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.