Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 94% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) | Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.80 | $0.13 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $4.00 | $0.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.080/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $1.600 / 1M | $0.098 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 8k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 75.2% | N/A |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) | Fast |
| Best For | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning | Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your workload requires real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your primary objective is dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Haiku against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.