DeepSeek R1 is 84% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/1M in and $2.19/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs DeepSeek R1
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and DeepSeek.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) | DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $3.00 | $0.55 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $15.00 | $2.19 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.300/1M | $0.140/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $6.000 / 1M | $0.960 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 131k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.3% | 90.8% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~50 t/s) | Reasoning (~40 t/s) |
| Best For | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning | Math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose DeepSeek R1
Choose DeepSeek R1 if your primary objective is math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with DeepSeek.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.