Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) is 89% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) costs $0.59/1M in and $0.79/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and Groq (Meta).
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) (Groq (Meta)) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $3.00 | $0.59 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $15.00 | $0.79 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.300/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $6.000 / 1M | $0.640 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.3% | 86.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~50 t/s) | Instant (~280 t/s) |
| Best For | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning | Instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) if your primary objective is instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.