Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) is 77% cheaper than OpenAI o1 on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while OpenAI o1 costs $15.00/1M in and $60.00/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs OpenAI o1
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) | OpenAI o1 (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $3.00 | $15.00 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $15.00 | $60.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.300/1M | $7.500/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $6.000 / 1M | $26.250 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 200k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.3% | 92.3% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~50 t/s) | Thoughtful (~30 t/s) |
| Best For | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning | PhD-level science, competitive programming, complex math and multi-step architecture planning |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose OpenAI o1
Choose OpenAI o1 if your primary objective is phd-level science, competitive programming, complex math and multi-step architecture planning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.