Home  /  Comparisons  /  Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 98% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.

Metric / Feature Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $3.00 $0.13
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $15.00 $0.00
Prompt Caching Input Rate $0.300/1M Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $6.000 / 1M $0.098 / 1M
Max Context Window 200k 8k
Multimodal Vision ✅ Supported ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark 88.3% N/A
Throughput & Latency Fast (~50 t/s) Fast
Best For Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases

When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) Specs →

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your primary objective is dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Large) Specs →

Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.