Home  /  Comparisons  /  Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs Text Embedding 3 (Small)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Small) is 100% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Small) costs $0.02/1M in and $0.00/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs Text Embedding 3 (Small)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.

Metric / Feature Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) Text Embedding 3 (Small) (OpenAI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $3.00 $0.02
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $15.00 $0.00
Prompt Caching Input Rate $0.300/1M Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $6.000 / 1M $0.015 / 1M
Max Context Window 200k 8k
Multimodal Vision ✅ Supported ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark 88.3% N/A
Throughput & Latency Fast (~50 t/s) Ultra-Fast
Best For Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning Vector search, semantic clustering, RAG index creation

When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) Specs →

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small) if your primary objective is vector search, semantic clustering, rag index creation. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Small) Specs →

Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.