Codestral 22B is 30% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out, while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) costs $0.59/1M in and $0.79/1M out.
Codestral 22B vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Mistral AI and Groq (Meta).
| Metric / Feature | Codestral 22B (Mistral AI) | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) (Groq (Meta)) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.30 | $0.59 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.90 | $0.79 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.450 / 1M | $0.640 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 81.1% | 86.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s) | Instant (~280 t/s) |
| Best For | Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration | Instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents |
When to Choose Codestral 22B
Choose Codestral 22B if your workload requires fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for teams needing Mistral AI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) if your primary objective is instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).
Want to compare Codestral 22B against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.