DeepSeek R1 is 40% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/1M in and $2.19/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out.
DeepSeek R1 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between DeepSeek and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.55 | $0.80 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $2.19 | $4.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.140/1M | $0.080/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.960 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 131k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 90.8% | 75.2% |
| Throughput & Latency | Reasoning (~40 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) |
| Best For | Math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning |
When to Choose DeepSeek R1
Choose DeepSeek R1 if your workload requires math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing DeepSeek's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your primary objective is real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare DeepSeek R1 against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.