Gemini 2.0 Flash is 82% cheaper than DeepSeek R1 on blended 3:1 token pricing. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/1M in and $2.19/1M out, while Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out.
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between DeepSeek and Google.
| Metric / Feature | DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.55 | $0.10 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $2.19 | $0.40 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.140/1M | $0.025/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.960 / 1M | $0.175 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 131k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 90.8% | 84.6% |
| Throughput & Latency | Reasoning (~40 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) |
| Best For | Math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops |
When to Choose DeepSeek R1
Choose DeepSeek R1 if your workload requires math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing DeepSeek's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your primary objective is real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Google.
Want to compare DeepSeek R1 against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.