GPT-4o Mini is 73% cheaper than DeepSeek R1 on blended 3:1 token pricing. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/1M in and $2.19/1M out, while GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M in and $0.60/1M out.
DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-4o Mini
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between DeepSeek and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) | GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.55 | $0.15 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $2.19 | $0.60 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.140/1M | $0.075/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.960 / 1M | $0.263 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 131k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 90.8% | 82.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Reasoning (~40 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~85 t/s) |
| Best For | Math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning | High-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization |
When to Choose DeepSeek R1
Choose DeepSeek R1 if your workload requires math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing DeepSeek's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose GPT-4o Mini
Choose GPT-4o Mini if your primary objective is high-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare DeepSeek R1 against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.