DeepSeek V3 is 89% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. DeepSeek V3 costs $0.14/1M in and $0.28/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out.
DeepSeek V3 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between DeepSeek and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.14 | $0.80 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.28 | $4.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.014/1M | $0.080/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.175 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 131k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.5% | 75.2% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~60 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) |
| Best For | General LLM routing, high-scale automation, cost reduction vs OpenAI | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning |
When to Choose DeepSeek V3
Choose DeepSeek V3 if your workload requires general llm routing, high-scale automation, cost reduction vs openai. Ideal for teams needing DeepSeek's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your primary objective is real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare DeepSeek V3 against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.