Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 44% cheaper than DeepSeek V3 on blended 3:1 token pricing. DeepSeek V3 costs $0.14/1M in and $0.28/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out.
DeepSeek V3 vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between DeepSeek and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) | Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.14 | $0.13 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.28 | $0.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.014/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.175 / 1M | $0.098 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 131k | 8k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.5% | N/A |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~60 t/s) | Fast |
| Best For | General LLM routing, high-scale automation, cost reduction vs OpenAI | Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases |
When to Choose DeepSeek V3
Choose DeepSeek V3 if your workload requires general llm routing, high-scale automation, cost reduction vs openai. Ideal for teams needing DeepSeek's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your primary objective is dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare DeepSeek V3 against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.