Gemini 1.5 Flash is 71% cheaper than Codestral 22B on blended 3:1 token pricing. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.07/1M in and $0.30/1M out, while Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out.
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Codestral 22B
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Google and Mistral AI.
| Metric / Feature | Gemini 1.5 Flash (Google) | Codestral 22B (Mistral AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.07 | $0.30 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.30 | $0.90 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.019/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.131 / 1M | $0.450 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 78.9% | 81.1% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~100 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s) |
| Best For | High-frequency API calls, audio processing, bulk document summarization | Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration |
When to Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if your workload requires high-frequency api calls, audio processing, bulk document summarization. Ideal for teams needing Google's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Codestral 22B
Choose Codestral 22B if your primary objective is fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Mistral AI.
Want to compare Gemini 1.5 Flash against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.