Gemini 2.0 Flash is 89% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out.
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Google and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.10 | $0.80 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.40 | $4.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.025/1M | $0.080/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.175 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 84.6% | 75.2% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning |
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your workload requires real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for teams needing Google's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your primary objective is real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare Gemini 2.0 Flash against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.