Gemini 2.0 Flash is 82% cheaper than DeepSeek R1 on blended 3:1 token pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out, while DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/1M in and $2.19/1M out.
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs DeepSeek R1
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Google and DeepSeek.
| Metric / Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) | DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.10 | $0.55 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.40 | $2.19 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.025/1M | $0.140/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.175 / 1M | $0.960 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 131k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 84.6% | 90.8% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) | Reasoning (~40 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops | Math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning |
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your workload requires real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for teams needing Google's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose DeepSeek R1
Choose DeepSeek R1 if your primary objective is math proofs, complex algorithmic coding, autonomous agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with DeepSeek.
Want to compare Gemini 2.0 Flash against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.