Gemini 2.0 Flash is 99% cheaper than OpenAI o1 on blended 3:1 token pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out, while OpenAI o1 costs $15.00/1M in and $60.00/1M out.
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs OpenAI o1
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Google and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) | OpenAI o1 (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.10 | $15.00 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.40 | $60.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.025/1M | $7.500/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.175 / 1M | $26.250 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 200k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 84.6% | 92.3% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) | Thoughtful (~30 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops | PhD-level science, competitive programming, complex math and multi-step architecture planning |
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your workload requires real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for teams needing Google's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose OpenAI o1
Choose OpenAI o1 if your primary objective is phd-level science, competitive programming, complex math and multi-step architecture planning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare Gemini 2.0 Flash against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.