Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) is 60% cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on blended 3:1 token pricing. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/1M in and $30.00/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out.
GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI) | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $30.00 | $15.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | $0.300/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $15.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 200k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 86.4% | 88.3% |
| Throughput & Latency | Standard (~25 t/s) | Fast (~50 t/s) |
| Best For | Legacy enterprise pipelines, large document analysis | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning |
When to Choose GPT-4 Turbo
Choose GPT-4 Turbo if your workload requires legacy enterprise pipelines, large document analysis. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your primary objective is autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare GPT-4 Turbo against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.