Gemini 2.0 Flash is 33% cheaper than GPT-4o Mini on blended 3:1 token pricing. GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M in and $0.60/1M out, while Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out.
GPT-4o Mini vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Google.
| Metric / Feature | GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.075/1M | $0.025/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.263 / 1M | $0.175 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 82.0% | 84.6% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~85 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) |
| Best For | High-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops |
When to Choose GPT-4o Mini
Choose GPT-4o Mini if your workload requires high-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your primary objective is real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Google.
Want to compare GPT-4o Mini against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.