Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 63% cheaper than GPT-4o Mini on blended 3:1 token pricing. GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M in and $0.60/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out.
GPT-4o Mini vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) | Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.15 | $0.13 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.60 | $0.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.075/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.263 / 1M | $0.098 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 8k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 82.0% | N/A |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~85 t/s) | Fast |
| Best For | High-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization | Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases |
When to Choose GPT-4o Mini
Choose GPT-4o Mini if your workload requires high-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your primary objective is dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare GPT-4o Mini against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.