Home  /  Comparisons  /  Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) vs Codestral 22B
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) is 87% cheaper than Codestral 22B on blended 3:1 token pricing. Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) costs $0.05/1M in and $0.08/1M out, while Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) vs Codestral 22B

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Groq (Meta) and Mistral AI.

Metric / Feature Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) (Groq (Meta)) Codestral 22B (Mistral AI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.05 $0.30
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.08 $0.90
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.058 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Max Context Window 128k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark 73.0% 81.1%
Throughput & Latency Blazing (~550 t/s) Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s)
Best For Instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration

When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) if your workload requires instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification. Ideal for teams needing Groq (Meta)'s infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) Specs →

When to Choose Codestral 22B

Choose Codestral 22B if your primary objective is fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Mistral AI.

View Full Codestral 22B Specs →

Want to compare Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.