Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) is 89% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) costs $0.59/1M in and $0.79/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out.
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Groq (Meta) and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) (Groq (Meta)) | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.59 | $3.00 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.79 | $15.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | $0.300/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.640 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 200k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 86.0% | 88.3% |
| Throughput & Latency | Instant (~280 t/s) | Fast (~50 t/s) |
| Best For | Instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning |
When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) if your workload requires instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents. Ideal for teams needing Groq (Meta)'s infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your primary objective is autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.