Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) is 77% cheaper than OpenAI o1 on blended 3:1 token pricing. OpenAI o1 costs $15.00/1M in and $60.00/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out.
OpenAI o1 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | OpenAI o1 (OpenAI) | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $15.00 | $3.00 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $60.00 | $15.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $7.500/1M | $0.300/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $26.250 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 200k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 92.3% | 88.3% |
| Throughput & Latency | Thoughtful (~30 t/s) | Fast (~50 t/s) |
| Best For | PhD-level science, competitive programming, complex math and multi-step architecture planning | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning |
When to Choose OpenAI o1
Choose OpenAI o1 if your workload requires phd-level science, competitive programming, complex math and multi-step architecture planning. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your primary objective is autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare OpenAI o1 against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.