Codestral 22B is 77% cheaper than OpenAI o3-mini on blended 3:1 token pricing. OpenAI o3-mini costs $1.10/1M in and $4.40/1M out, while Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out.
OpenAI o3-mini vs Codestral 22B
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Mistral AI.
| Metric / Feature | OpenAI o3-mini (OpenAI) | Codestral 22B (Mistral AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $1.10 | $0.30 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $4.40 | $0.90 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.550/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $1.925 / 1M | $0.450 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 89.5% | 81.1% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast Reasoning (~60 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s) |
| Best For | High-throughput complex code synthesis and mathematical logic | Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration |
When to Choose OpenAI o3-mini
Choose OpenAI o3-mini if your workload requires high-throughput complex code synthesis and mathematical logic. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Codestral 22B
Choose Codestral 22B if your primary objective is fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Mistral AI.
Want to compare OpenAI o3-mini against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.