Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 95% cheaper than OpenAI o3-mini on blended 3:1 token pricing. OpenAI o3-mini costs $1.10/1M in and $4.40/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out.
OpenAI o3-mini vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | OpenAI o3-mini (OpenAI) | Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $1.10 | $0.13 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $4.40 | $0.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.550/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $1.925 / 1M | $0.098 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 8k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 89.5% | N/A |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast Reasoning (~60 t/s) | Fast |
| Best For | High-throughput complex code synthesis and mathematical logic | Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases |
When to Choose OpenAI o3-mini
Choose OpenAI o3-mini if your workload requires high-throughput complex code synthesis and mathematical logic. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your primary objective is dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare OpenAI o3-mini against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.