Home  /  Comparisons  /  Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 98% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Anthropic.

Metric / Feature Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.13 $3.00
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.00 $15.00
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available $0.300/1M
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.098 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Max Context Window 8k 200k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ✅ Supported
MMLU Benchmark N/A 88.3%
Throughput & Latency Fast Fast (~50 t/s)
Best For Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your workload requires dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Large) Specs →

When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your primary objective is autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.

View Full Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) Specs →

Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Large) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.