Home  /  Comparisons  /  Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Codestral 22B
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 78% cheaper than Codestral 22B on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Codestral 22B

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Mistral AI.

Metric / Feature Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) Codestral 22B (Mistral AI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.13 $0.30
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.00 $0.90
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.098 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Max Context Window 8k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark N/A 81.1%
Throughput & Latency Fast Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s)
Best For Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your workload requires dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Large) Specs →

When to Choose Codestral 22B

Choose Codestral 22B if your primary objective is fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Mistral AI.

View Full Codestral 22B Specs →

Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Large) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.