Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 26% cheaper than Gemini 1.5 Flash on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.07/1M in and $0.30/1M out.
Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Gemini 1.5 Flash
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Google.
| Metric / Feature | Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) | Gemini 1.5 Flash (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.13 | $0.07 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.00 | $0.30 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | $0.019/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.098 / 1M | $0.131 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 8k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | N/A | 78.9% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast | Ultra-Fast (~100 t/s) |
| Best For | Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases | High-frequency API calls, audio processing, bulk document summarization |
When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)
Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your workload requires dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if your primary objective is high-frequency api calls, audio processing, bulk document summarization. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Google.
Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Large) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.