Home  /  Comparisons  /  Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs GPT-4o (Omni)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Large) is 98% cheaper than GPT-4o (Omni) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.50/1M in and $10.00/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs GPT-4o (Omni)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and OpenAI.

Metric / Feature Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) GPT-4o (Omni) (OpenAI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.13 $2.50
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.00 $10.00
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available $1.250/1M
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.098 / 1M $4.375 / 1M
Max Context Window 8k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ✅ Supported
MMLU Benchmark N/A 88.7%
Throughput & Latency Fast Fast (~45 t/s)
Best For Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases Complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your workload requires dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Large) Specs →

When to Choose GPT-4o (Omni)

Choose GPT-4o (Omni) if your primary objective is complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.

View Full GPT-4o (Omni) Specs →

Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Large) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.