Home  /  Comparisons  /  Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) is 41% cheaper than Text Embedding 3 (Large) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) costs $0.05/1M in and $0.08/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Text Embedding 3 (Large) vs Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Groq (Meta).

Metric / Feature Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI) Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) (Groq (Meta))
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.13 $0.05
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.00 $0.08
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.098 / 1M $0.058 / 1M
Max Context Window 8k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark N/A 73.0%
Throughput & Latency Fast Blazing (~550 t/s)
Best For Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases Instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your workload requires dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Large) Specs →

When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) if your primary objective is instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).

View Full Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) Specs →

Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Large) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.