Home  /  Comparisons  /  Text Embedding 3 (Small) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Small) is 98% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Small) costs $0.02/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) costs $0.59/1M in and $0.79/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Text Embedding 3 (Small) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Groq (Meta).

Metric / Feature Text Embedding 3 (Small) (OpenAI) Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) (Groq (Meta))
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.02 $0.59
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.00 $0.79
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.015 / 1M $0.640 / 1M
Max Context Window 8k 128k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark N/A 86.0%
Throughput & Latency Ultra-Fast Instant (~280 t/s)
Best For Vector search, semantic clustering, RAG index creation Instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small) if your workload requires vector search, semantic clustering, rag index creation. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Small) Specs →

When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)

Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) if your primary objective is instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).

View Full Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) Specs →

Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Small) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.