Home  /  Comparisons  /  Text Embedding 3 (Small) vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)
⚡ Quick Comparison Verdict

Text Embedding 3 (Small) is 85% cheaper than Text Embedding 3 (Large) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Small) costs $0.02/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Text Embedding 3 (Large) costs $0.13/1M in and $0.00/1M out.

Head-to-Head Token Economics

Text Embedding 3 (Small) vs Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and OpenAI.

Metric / Feature Text Embedding 3 (Small) (OpenAI) Text Embedding 3 (Large) (OpenAI)
Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.02 $0.13
Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) $0.00 $0.00
Prompt Caching Input Rate Not Available Not Available
Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) $0.015 / 1M $0.098 / 1M
Max Context Window 8k 8k
Multimodal Vision ❌ Text Only ❌ Text Only
MMLU Benchmark N/A N/A
Throughput & Latency Ultra-Fast Fast
Best For Vector search, semantic clustering, RAG index creation Dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small) if your workload requires vector search, semantic clustering, rag index creation. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Small) Specs →

When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large)

Choose Text Embedding 3 (Large) if your primary objective is dense multilingual retrieval, legal/medical knowledge bases. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.

View Full Text Embedding 3 (Large) Specs →

Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Small) against another model?

Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.